I intended to send out part two of my special article for coffee buyers today but the horrific attack in Moscow has scuttled that plan. It’s 5 PM in Tokyo now. So by the time I get the list together to send, it will probably be tomorrow. The Attack
Whomever actually did this,did so to inflame the war in Ukraine and I assume that is what we'll see. On thing for certain,Moscow's responce will be extreme.
"Rather than consolidate power among a narrow group of family and clan, the government of President Rahmon would be wise to replace Russian support with greater domestic legitimacy....
....This requires a clear commitment by the government of Tajikistan. And the international community can help. In particular, the United States and the European Union should consider extending increased economic partnership and investment opportunities to support the reform process and alleviate the pain caused by the consequences of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Yet, any new assistance package and investment initiative should be tied to progress on political and economic reforms and mechanisms that ensure accountability and transparency in the process.
There are already several hints pointing to the "usual suspects" (i.e. Ukrainians and their enablers: Americans, British and the rest of NATO). I talk about them in the article I wrote soon after the terrorist attack: https://open.substack.com/pub/geopolitiq/p/terrorist-attack-in-moscow
"Just an hour or two after the attack, the State Department assured the world that the Ukraine had nothing to do with the attack. In conversation with the Judge Napolitano and Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson points out that the Americans couldn't possibly have information to make that assessment".
Unless they know who did carry out the attack. Which would be the case if they themselves did it. As with the Nord Stream sabotage, the obvious culprits may be the actual ones.
If the Ukie regime moves to Florida will they destroy USA?
I'm hoping that NATO has signed its own death sentence.
Whomever actually did this,did so to inflame the war in Ukraine and I assume that is what we'll see. On thing for certain,Moscow's responce will be extreme.
Per Intel Slava Z, one captured terrorist is from Tajikistan, plus a Tajikistan passport was found in the abandoned suspect getaway car.
Interesting info on Tajikistan as it relates to Ukraine & US:
https://www.usip.org/publications/2022/05/russias-ukraine-war-weighs-heavily-tajikistan
"Rather than consolidate power among a narrow group of family and clan, the government of President Rahmon would be wise to replace Russian support with greater domestic legitimacy....
....This requires a clear commitment by the government of Tajikistan. And the international community can help. In particular, the United States and the European Union should consider extending increased economic partnership and investment opportunities to support the reform process and alleviate the pain caused by the consequences of Russia’s war in Ukraine. Yet, any new assistance package and investment initiative should be tied to progress on political and economic reforms and mechanisms that ensure accountability and transparency in the process.
There are already several hints pointing to the "usual suspects" (i.e. Ukrainians and their enablers: Americans, British and the rest of NATO). I talk about them in the article I wrote soon after the terrorist attack: https://open.substack.com/pub/geopolitiq/p/terrorist-attack-in-moscow
"Just an hour or two after the attack, the State Department assured the world that the Ukraine had nothing to do with the attack. In conversation with the Judge Napolitano and Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson points out that the Americans couldn't possibly have information to make that assessment".
Unless they know who did carry out the attack. Which would be the case if they themselves did it. As with the Nord Stream sabotage, the obvious culprits may be the actual ones.