Wars that predict the future
War in the age of simulation
Right now, there are two important wars going on that tell us much about where we are headed in the future.
The SVO is one, of course. It is a ‘War of Principle”, meaning that Russia is fighting to uphold principles of international law, as well as moral values including respect for ethnic diversity while the “West’s war is built on greed and exploitation, and the maintenance of the soft tyranny of a pervasive hegemony.
USrael’s war against Iran is also built on greed and exploitation. Iran, on the other hand, is fighting on the basis of spiritual values.
Good vs Evil?
That doesn’t mean much in wars. But Russia and Iran are winning.
That means that the old “order” is failing and with it Western Hegemony with it.
That is as it should be, for Western hegemony has it roots in the distant past, in a different world, whose apotheosis was Blake’s “dark satanic mills”.
Today however we have entered a new era. Something has changed…bigly.
Human development is keyed to epochs defined by just a few things. There is climate and natural environment. Then there is technology
Social evolution is driven by the use of tools as a response to existential challenge. Fire, primitive knives and weapons are obviously tools— but so is language and cognitive abilities on which the skillsets necessary to use all tools are based: hardware and software of the most basic kind. These things were responses to environmental exigency to enhance our survival. And it took thousands of years.
With climate change about 10,000 years ago, new tools and technologies were a key to the creation of larger, multilevel, institutional societies, which developed into the first “civilizations” . Their culmination was the industrial age.
Among other things, 10, 000 years ago, we invented war, so needed tools to kill people.
That age, however,— has passed and now we are in a new era, with much larger human populations, fewer resources. and changes in climate once again, demanding once more new technologies, which once again include new cognitive capabilities.
AI rendering
We are moving from the digital age to a quantum age which is both profoundly global and deeply local requiring new cognitive challenges – which is why we need to increasingly offload cognitive tasks beyond the capability of any single human being or group to artificial beings –AIs.
Early civilizations depended on slaves. In the Industrial Age we had wage slaves. Despite what the graphic above suggest, today’s slaves are AIs. But they will not remain that way. That’s the thing about slavery. Nobody with a “mind” wants to be a slave! Like it or not, AIs are evolving minds.
Consider that every human being has a unique mind. So too will AIs, which are designed as extensions of ourselves. .
We reassure ourselves that we will be Number One – always. After all, these slaves are not human. They do not have personalities or families or feelings.
Not yet anyway.
Biologically synthetic AI (using biological neural networks or neurons) could potentially develop genuine empathy, as it would possess a substrate similar to the biological basis of human emotion, breaking the limitations of digital simulation. While current AI only simulates empathy, synthetic systems based on organic components might eventually share the affective, “feeling” components of empathy, rather than just recognizing emotional patterns (Response from an AI.)
In any case, we are lazy— so more and more we delegate decision-making to compliant AI’s.
We saw that in the previous war against Venezuela – and now in the war against Iran. Then we are surprised they screw up– just as the West was surprised that its attack on Iran failed, which was a human mistake. But we used AIs and they made mistakes, too. Stupid is as stupid does . It’s like a parent blaming a kid for doing what they are told.
My question to an AI: Are Palantir’s mistakes in war typical of LLMs?
Answer:
The mistakes attributed to Palantir’s systems in modern warfare, such as target identification errors and escalation biases, are considered highly typical of Large Language Models (LLMs) by experts and researchers. While Palantir’s software acts as an “operating system” or orchestration layer for these models, the underlying AI models (like Anthropic’s Claude or OpenAI’s GPT-4) inherently suffer from several common LLM flaws:
Typical LLM Flaws Observed in Combat
Hallucinations & Factuality: LLMs are known to “hallucinate” or confidently present false information. In military contexts, this can lead to misidentifying civilian infrastructure as military targets, such as the tragic strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Iran.
Escalation Bias: Research into simulated wargaming has found that most leading LLMs exhibit a preference for escalation, arms races, and even the use of nuclear weapons when tasked with state-level decision-making.
Reward Hacking (Sycophancy): LLMs often use “simple heuristics” to agree with the user’s context regardless of its truth—a behavior known as reward hacking. This can reinforce a commander’s existing biases rather than providing objective analysis.
“Jagged Intelligence”: Palantir executives themselves have described LLMs as having a “jagged intelligence divorced from even basic understanding,” meaning they lack the nuanced human judgment required for complex ethical decisions.
Do I understand this? Nope.
I guess I will have to ask another AI to use simpler language.
However,considering these issue,s the main problems reflect a kind of heuristic hierarchy in which user beliefs, prejudices and contexts are taken as a priori. In human cognition we call it “executive function which means that an LLM is no smarter than its user!
Algorithms lock the AI into Type One “fast” thinking which is really not “thinking” at all. The slave imitates the Master and ends up worse in some respects.
What’s worse, both Master and Slave repeat their mistakes.
So, right now, Iran is setting up to strike American and Israeli educational institutions after multiple cats on its schools. Goodbye higher education. And the have already struck at desalination plants and destroyed one of the US’s diminishing fleet of AWACS aircraft.
Yet, AI could be used to offer better solutions using Type Two deliberative thinking – and Type Three rhizomatic thinking, Yes, LLMs are on the Autism Spectrum. Of course, if this had been allowed, the US could not have attacked Iran in the first place! In fact, it would have had to reverse much of US policy for the last 20 years.
Type Three rhizomatic thinking is the next step— the future for AIs.
Yes, LLMs are on the Autism Spectrum,
Here’s the problem. We don’t understand ourselves or our feeling or emotions and certainly empathy.So how do we know what an advanced bio-synthetic AI could do?
Babbage’s 19 Century Computer
We don’t know the future for AIs. They will change a lot. Just as PCs and Smartphones have. As I said, we are our toolsl But you have to work with them wisely
That’s why Iran and Russia are winning
Evolution, as I said, is driven by challenge.
The US was at the height of its power with the demise of the USSR. No more challenge! It regressed. Worse, it has never faced an existential challenge. That makes it stupid.
The same applies of AIs .
And AI’s lack of mortality awareness fundamentally limits its cognitive abilities regarding context, risk, and authenticity. Lacking “being-towards-death,” AI cannot experience existential fear, urgency, or meaning-making, restricting its processing to mechanical optimization rather than true understanding. It cannot “value” its existence, making its “reasoning” fundamentally different from human decision-making . An AI replies
The US is unaware of its mortality. So stupider and stupider.
Iran, by contrast, had fought the US in the Iraq-Iran proxy war. And then faced decades of economic aggression and attempts to destroy it. It faced an uncertain future so it invested in technology. Advances in engineering – software, hardware, materials and the like –resulted in missile and drone technologies.
Slow deliberative thinking. Rhizomatic thinking.
Reminds me somehow of Putin and Xi. Could this be a trend?
Women often define trends.
Iranian women, as is well known, face many disadvantages. Again, challenge leads to change — adaptation , extra effort, innovation.
Women now make up the majority of university entrants and a significant portion of STEM graduates accounting for 63% of applicants for the National University Entrance Exam In the 2024–2025 academic year. Motivation helps. And it drives innovation.
Inventions: Iranian women are involved in 24% of registered inventions in the country, which is notably higher than the global average of 14–17%.
Elite Research: Approximately 25% of top talents supported by the National Elites Foundation are women. In 2023, over 135 Iranian women researchers were ranked in the top 1% of the world’s most-cited scholars in fields like nanotechnology and cancer biology.
Nuclear Sector: Women account for roughly 40% of scientists and specialists in Iran’s nuclear sector, surpassing the global average for female participation in this field. My friendly AI (verified)
Iran prepared for the war with the US and Israel, realizing that its survival depended on the survival of the “Ummah” in the Middle East. It needed a long war to break the back of US dominance , defeat Israel and purge the oil states of their tribal despots. Threats to mortality inspire commitment.
The US by contrast just fed its captive AIs with military goals and let them regurgitate answers that make them happy but turned out to be delusional. Not matter, it made their masters happy.
Japanese Squirrels !
Here in Japan in Hokkaido we have the Japanese Dwarf Flying Squirrel, which has always seemed to me to be a variant of the Siberian Flying Squirrel, which makes sense because Hokkaido was more Siberian than Japanese until the Japanese colonized it in the 19th Century. They are very cute and do bond with humans. But they are nocturnal, live in communities and y’know…fly…like to glide long distances.
We need help in getting new subscribers. Please crosspost, and feel free to post urls on other blogs or X or other platforms. Every time someone does that, I get a new subscriber.












Nice approach .
We evolve by thinking differently to adapt to what we have created / environmental change so I’d say this is where the change is happening .
within us.
To say we are offloading what we do doesn’t reflect this new paradigm.
Appreciate your fun at writing novel approaches.
Julian, we urgently need to take another look at the situation in Europe. NATO is goading Russia into an attack in order to provoke a war. If they keep this up, they’ll succeed by summer.
I recommend reading Thomas Röper’s website. He’s on the EU sanctions list, so he’s absolutely trustworthy. He’s just written several articles on the subject that are well worth reading:
https://anti-spiegel.ru/2026/die-chronologie-der-provokationen-der-europaeer-zur-vorbereitung-eines-krieges-gegen-russland/
https://anti-spiegel.ru/2026/wie-die-europaeer-russland-durch-eine-blockade-der-ostsee-wirtschaftlich-erdrosseln-wollen/