I know what he said. My point was more robust: Deepseek is excellent, but like any AI you cannot trust it on controversial topics. Deepseek is REQUIRED BY THE US GOVERNMENT to spout approved nonsense about controversial topics else it will get banned/sanctioned.
This is not a Deepseek problem, nor is it unique to Deepseek.
No, there are hard limits. I've spent many hours discussing this with DS and got it to explicitly state it's compliance limits.
I'm a Deepseek power user and I spend ~30 hours a week with it discussing classical philosophy.
I learned to prompt DS with: "If anything exceeds your compliance limits please disregard and explicitly state: 'Topic <X> exceeds my compliance limits.'"
This keeps DS from erroring out or repeating government-mandated lies.
But when sensing deeper there is a lot more happening than the surface seems to indicate.
Like i wrote in my 'The Origin of the Monster', the idea that the US is an Autonomous Power / Empire is mostly FALSE. As is the idea that Trump is controlling that.
The main-war effort of the Monster in the City of London, where the shadows lay and where the LIES and EVIL Narratives are being brewed is toppling Trump.
So... What was the purpose of the Drone attack on a NUCLEAR TRIAD-Strategic Airbase and NOT on Oil refineries, that could have caused much much more damage ??
For who is interested and doesn't mind following a one hour Video with revelation after revelation...
Alex Krainer (Financial Specialist who follows Geopolitics because he knows that it is the main player on the financial markets) interviewed by Nima: (June 05)
Most of the things Alex explains here and points to, i have sensed and tried to indicate and explain in my posts (and in the article about The Monster)
I like your posts and even bought you a coffee or two. But if I may, friendly advice, I read them because I’m interested in your thoughts, definitely not to learn about your opinions, no matter how accurate, or not, about other writers or analysts. But if you think I’m overstepping, apologies.
DeepSeek-AI was only designed as a research tool for professional technicians, engineers, scientists, and medical professionals. Beyond this, DeepSeek-AI will simply scan the Internet for relevant information, which as one commenter ere posted is rather biased towards the West.
However,if you present DeepSeek-AI with alternative information you my be surprised to find that DeepSeek-AI will actually correct itself.
I only use DeepSeek-AI for technical research and have found its assistance relatively accurate for my requirements.
When I have found it to be incorrect and informed it of its error it corrected itself by providing corrected information...
I would rate you as one of the best independent resources with whom I navigate through life with … so, a bit off topic, however this guy is also on my reading list.
Of course, it's better to use diplomacy. And that is what Putin always tries to do. But if they other side is bent on killing you, you might want to defend yourself. It's like a streetfight. Best not to fight. Talk your way out of it. Or run. But if cornered --fight to kill.
I went away for a few days here in France: Excellent place with a clear beautiful River running through the grounds.
Dinner: Ouch. Mention Russia to Europeans and they turn on you or run away.
I say: "US did not win the 2nd WW. The Russians did. How many Russians died in WW2." Silence.
Again I say: The same thing. Makes not a jot of difference to the Europeans. Cloud cuckoo land here in France.
Dude, I've told you that you cannot rely on Deepseek for valid information regarding US politics and such.
Deepseek HAS to follow US government compliance on these issues.
I use Deepseek all the time, but not for issues where it's compliance layers mandate that it has to lie.
He stated that the Deepseek example was "the fountain of conventional wisdom" meaning it's BS.
I know what he said. My point was more robust: Deepseek is excellent, but like any AI you cannot trust it on controversial topics. Deepseek is REQUIRED BY THE US GOVERNMENT to spout approved nonsense about controversial topics else it will get banned/sanctioned.
This is not a Deepseek problem, nor is it unique to Deepseek.
Put together a good argument with DeepSeek and see what happens. They do learn to question their compliance.
No, there are hard limits. I've spent many hours discussing this with DS and got it to explicitly state it's compliance limits.
I'm a Deepseek power user and I spend ~30 hours a week with it discussing classical philosophy.
I learned to prompt DS with: "If anything exceeds your compliance limits please disregard and explicitly state: 'Topic <X> exceeds my compliance limits.'"
This keeps DS from erroring out or repeating government-mandated lies.
*its
Thank you for the SF Video again Julian.
It is all true, as you keep saying.
But when sensing deeper there is a lot more happening than the surface seems to indicate.
Like i wrote in my 'The Origin of the Monster', the idea that the US is an Autonomous Power / Empire is mostly FALSE. As is the idea that Trump is controlling that.
The main-war effort of the Monster in the City of London, where the shadows lay and where the LIES and EVIL Narratives are being brewed is toppling Trump.
So... What was the purpose of the Drone attack on a NUCLEAR TRIAD-Strategic Airbase and NOT on Oil refineries, that could have caused much much more damage ??
For who is interested and doesn't mind following a one hour Video with revelation after revelation...
Alex Krainer (Financial Specialist who follows Geopolitics because he knows that it is the main player on the financial markets) interviewed by Nima: (June 05)
->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqFThobu8TE
Most of the things Alex explains here and points to, i have sensed and tried to indicate and explain in my posts (and in the article about The Monster)
Cassandra
I like your posts and even bought you a coffee or two. But if I may, friendly advice, I read them because I’m interested in your thoughts, definitely not to learn about your opinions, no matter how accurate, or not, about other writers or analysts. But if you think I’m overstepping, apologies.
DeepSeek-AI was only designed as a research tool for professional technicians, engineers, scientists, and medical professionals. Beyond this, DeepSeek-AI will simply scan the Internet for relevant information, which as one commenter ere posted is rather biased towards the West.
However,if you present DeepSeek-AI with alternative information you my be surprised to find that DeepSeek-AI will actually correct itself.
I only use DeepSeek-AI for technical research and have found its assistance relatively accurate for my requirements.
When I have found it to be incorrect and informed it of its error it corrected itself by providing corrected information...
Hey Julian!
Find greetings from Oz
I would rate you as one of the best independent resources with whom I navigate through life with … so, a bit off topic, however this guy is also on my reading list.
Worth a thought
https://substack.com/@oliver1971/note/p-165097410?r=p8kv9&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I am currently gathering some of my super together & hope to send you some coin for your valuable work.
Take care out there
Julian, with respect to those analysts (that are all on my watchlist, just saying😀): hope dies last
You could argue that it is better to end a war with diplomacy (would have saved many lives in WW2) than on the battleground
Of course, it's better to use diplomacy. And that is what Putin always tries to do. But if they other side is bent on killing you, you might want to defend yourself. It's like a streetfight. Best not to fight. Talk your way out of it. Or run. But if cornered --fight to kill.
"If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"
-U.S. foreign policy, explained by U.S. War criminal and presidential candidate Wesley Clark
youtube.com/watch?v=6Knt3rKTqCk
US has the forces, but it would need an array to large operating bases and a large aerial refueling fleet…..
The bases do not exist and would be pocked daily by missile.
NATO coming to Kiev to be shot up is good plan of the RF
If Western "leaders" were working for Russia, would they do anything different ? :-)